Ganes v telecom namibia ltd 2004
WebConsequently, the company has an action, described as sui generis, to claim a disgorgement of that profit from him (see eg Robinson v Randfontein Estates Gold Mining Co Ltd 1921 AD 168 (per Innes CJ at 177 - 8 D and 192 and per Solomon JA at 241 - 2), Phillips v Fieldstone Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another 2004 (3) SA 465 (SCA) para [30] and … http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2003/123.pdf
Ganes v telecom namibia ltd 2004
Did you know?
Web"Fairbridges are the duly appointed attorneys of record for Telecom Namibia Limited, the Applicant in this application". That allegation in unchallenged. It therefore serves as … WebMar 20, 2024 · In 2004 the Supreme Court of Appeal said in Ganes v Telecom Namibia Ltd: “As an employee of the [company] and in the absence of an agreement to the …
WebFor this purpose that must authorize the institution of the proceedings and the prosecution thereof (Ganes v Telecom Namibia Ltd 2004 (3) SA 615 (SCA) at 624). They must also authorise one of their number or someone else (e.g. a manager or the secretary) to represent the company in such proceedings.” 21. WebFeb 14, 2011 · that Ganes defrauded Telecom Namibia Ltd over a period of 9 months while in its employ as its procurement manager. The accused and three other persons conspired and devised a scheme whereby they would benefit financially, whereas Telecom would suffer actual and potential prejudice. In short, the scheme involved, inter alia, the
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2001/9.html http://www.saflii.org.za/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2024/524.pdf
WebFeb 25, 2015 · 2 Ganes and Anpther v Telecom Namibia Ltd 2004 (3) SA 615 (SCA) at paragraphs [18] – [19] , ... 3 Ganes and Anpther v Telecom Namibia Ltd (supra) at 624 G- H. 4 It was served and filed on 14 April 2014. 5 Gericke v Sack 1978(1) SA 821 (A) at 828 A-D; Macleod v Kweyiya 2013(6) SA 1 (SCA), paragraph [10] at 6F-G.
http://www.saflii.org.za/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2015/206.html burnout 3 signature takedownsWebPoolquip Industries (Pty) Ltd v Griffin and Another 1978 (4) SA 353 (W). See also: Ganes and Another v Telecom Namibia Ltd 2004 (3) SA 615 (SCA) at par [19], 624 F-J, where an attorney deposed to an affidavit declaring that he was duly authorised to institute proceedings on behalf of the Respondent in that matter. The facts burnout 3 signature takedowns ps2WebEx parte Neethling and Others 1951 (4) SA 331 (A): dictum at 335E approved E Federated Trust Ltd v Botha 1978 (3) SA 645 (A): compared Ganes and Another v Telecom Namibia Ltd 2004 (3) SA 615 (SCA) ([2004] 2 All SA 609): dictum at 615H compared Gool v Minister of Justice and Another 1955 (2) SA 682 (C): referred to Hepute and Others v Minister of … burnout 3 takedown black skyWebAccording to the first appellant his liabilities amounted to approximately N$923 848,52 and the value of his assets to R4 045 000 including R1 800 000 being the value of a 100% … burnout 3 takedown all carshttp://namibialii.org/na/cases/NAHC/2011/23.html burnout 3 seaportWebemployer’s interests. (Ganes and Another v Telecom Namibia Ltd 2004 (3) SA 615 (SCA)) Thus an employee must not place his or her self-interest over the business interests of his or her employer. An employee who absents himself or herself from work without due permission of the employer has, in the result, placed his or her self- burnout 3 takedown cheat codesburnout 3 takedown backwards compatibility