WebRobert Hammond OFFICE NUMBER: 1088-664 KIND OF CASE: Wrongful Termination DOCKET NUMBER: F-1088-664 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a former employee of defendant attorney and his law firm. She is suing forwrongful discharge after having "blown the whistle" on the defendants' allegedly improper billing practices. WebCITATION: Brown v. Hammond, 810 F. Supp. 644, United States Eastern District, Pennsylvania 1993 FACTS: Plaintiff was employed as the defendants paralegal and at-will secretary from November 4, 1990 to April 4, 1991. The Defendants directed plaintiff to bill her hours with an attorney’s rate.
Brown CS: Recent Undergraduate Capstone Project Abstracts
WebThumbnail brief of Brown v. Hammond.Reasoning: As to issue (ii) the court agreed no employee should be forced to choose between her livelihood and engaging in fraudulent conduct and if this is what is alleged, by her claim, then she should be … WebUnformatted Attachment Preview. 1 Capstone Project: Brown vs. Hammond case Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Course Name and Number Professor’s Name Assignment Due Date 2 Brown vs. Hammond, 810 F. Supp. 644 (E.D. Pa. 1993) Complaint In the case Brown vs. Hammond, 810 F. Supp. 644 (E.D. Pa. 1993), the plaintiff was … lycee cdg
Paralegal Capstone Project.docx - Brown v. Hammond …
WebHammond :: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court :: Federal Court Proceeding No. Civ. A. No. 92-3155. Brown v. Hammond. Federal Court Proceeding Pennsylvania Eastern … Web8. During the course of her employment with the Defendants, Mr. Hammond and his associates directed Ms. Brown on numerous occasions to engage in improper bill practices by billing paralegal time as attorney time without any such notice to clients that the work had been done by a non-lawyer. 9. WebFeb 26, 2024 · Capstone Project For your capstone project, you'll apply what you learn in Chapters 7 through 12 of your Introduction to … lycee cfa btp